Did you know that among budget metal detectors there is a gradation? And yes, it is expressed both in characteristics, often cut down from the more advanced version, so as not to interfere with sales of the older model, and in price. There is a certain group of people who are guided primarily by price, and only then by the characteristics of the model. As for me, it’s always better to take a metal detector a little taller in order to be able to grow out of this model for a long time, especially if you are a beginner.
What we see here? Video depth test on buried targets and two devices — Garrett ACE 250 and Fisher F11. What do you think — what’s wrong here? Price class, right. ICQ is noticeably more expensive than Fisher F11, and therefore it would be better to compare ICQ 250 with Fisher F22, for the purity of the experiment. F11 competes with ICQ 150. But still, it’s almost two times cheaper, and shows targets a little worse, so what should I take? I would bet on F44 with a coil from a third-party manufacturer, the result will be better than the two shown in the video detectors.
Fisher F44 is an interesting device. About F44 we collect all the information here, look, only recently new posts appeared.
